Deepak Rathour
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Civil Services Examination (CSE) stands as India’s principal gateway to administrative elite positions, embodying the "Great Indian Dream" for millions of aspirants (Poonam, 2018) [13]. However, this rigorous, multi-stage examination is marked by profound linguistic asymmetries, persistently marginalizing aspirants who opt for Hindi as their medium of instruction. This research investigates the structural, pedagogical, and psychological barriers contributing to the low selection rates of Hindi-medium candidates following the 2013 examination pattern reforms. Drawing primarily on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital, the study posits that English operates as a form of symbolic capital, functioning as a gatekeeping mechanism that reinforces existing social hierarchies under the guise of meritocracy (Bourdieu, 1991) [5]. Based on structured interviews with 15 Hindi-medium aspirants in Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, the study confirms significant inequities in access to quality study materials, the disproportionate challenge posed by the Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT), and a strong perception of systemic bias in Mains evaluation. The findings highlight the urgent need for policy interventions aimed at ensuring linguistic equity, enhancing resource quality, and establishing transparent and fair evaluation mechanisms to safeguard democratic representation in India’s administrative apparatus.
Pages: 443-446 | 259 Views 150 Downloads